[labnetwork] cleanroom occupancy ratings

[Schultz, Steven]

We typically recommend H5 for design due to the chemical loading benefits allowed by the code.
Unless the lab is presumed essentially dry or minimal 'wet' (lesser chem types / classes) you really should stay with H5 and the applicable NFPA's. 

STEVEN SCHULTZ R.A.
LEED AP BD+C
HDR Architecture
Sr.  Project Manager 

3200 E. Camelback Road, Suite 250 | Phoenix, AZ 85018 
602.522.4391 
steven.schultz at hdrinc.com | hdrarchitecture.com
Follow Us - Architizer | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Flickr



-----Original Message-----
From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Iulian Codreanu
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Fab Network
Subject: [labnetwork] cleanroom occupancy ratings

Dear Colleagues,

Happy New Year and thank you for all the useful feedback you have provided!

Could you please tell me/us what the occupancy rating of your cleanroom is?  I am trying to convince some folks that H-5 is better suited for future research flexibility than B.

Thank you very much.

Iulian

--
iulian Codreanu, Ph.D.
Director of Operations, UD Nanofab
149 Evans Hall
Newark, DE 19716
302-831-2784


_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork