[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Matthieu Nannini]

Dear colleagues,

Is the list searchable ? I know one can browse the list archives but can 
you search it ?
That would be the only downside of the mailing list if it wasn't 
searchable and maybe switching to a "one subject" forum engine like 
phpBB would be useful for search purposes if we don't want the questions 
to be duplicated.

-- 
-----------------------------------
Matthieu Nannini
McGill Nanotools Microfab

> Walsh,Kevin M. <mailto:kevin.walsh at louisville.edu>
> 3 juillet 2014 11:03
>
> I vote for  1 listserve
>
> *Dr. Kevin M. Walsh*
>
> Ky nanoNET Director
>
> Samuel T. Fife Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Founding Director of the UofL Micro/Nanotechnology Center
>
> 2210 South Brook St
>
> Shumaker Research Building, Room 234
>
> Louisville, KY 40292
>
> Office # (502) 852-0826
>
> Fax # (502) 852-8128
>
> *http://kynanonet.org/*
>
> Description: Capture for email signature**
>
> *From:*labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu 
> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] *On Behalf Of *Morrison, 
> Richard H., Jr.
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 03, 2014 9:14 AM
> *To:* Mac Hathaway; labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?
>
> I vote that we keep just one Labnet list. It will just make more work 
> for the person whom moderates the list today. I suggest that we can 
> ask any questions related to fab work including process questions.
>
> Rick
>
> *From:*labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu 
> <mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu> 
> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] *On Behalf Of *Mac Hathaway
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 02, 2014 9:56 AM
> *To:* labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
> *Subject:* [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?
>
> Hey All,
>
> As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of 
> Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and 
> administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), 
> I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain 
> question, out of deference to others...
>
> If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for 
> instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where 
> much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as 
> "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA 
> in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  
> I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list might bring in other 
> folks for whom the general questions have not been sufficiently 
> relevant to merit their attention.
>
> Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...
>
>
> Mac Hathaway
> Harvard CNS
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
> Morrison, Richard H., Jr. <mailto:rmorrison at draper.com>
> 3 juillet 2014 09:14
>
> I vote that we keep just one Labnet list. It will just make more work 
> for the person whom moderates the list today. I suggest that we can 
> ask any questions related to fab work including process questions.
>
> Rick
>
> *From:*labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu 
> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] *On Behalf Of *Mac Hathaway
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 02, 2014 9:56 AM
> *To:* labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> *Subject:* [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?
>
> Hey All,
>
> As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of 
> Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and 
> administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), 
> I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain 
> question, out of deference to others...
>
> If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for 
> instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where 
> much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as 
> "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA 
> in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  
> I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list might bring in other 
> folks for whom the general questions have not been sufficiently 
> relevant to merit their attention.
>
> Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...
>
>
> Mac Hathaway
> Harvard CNS
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/f08f3eda/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11936 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/f08f3eda/attachment.jpg>