[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Abbie Gregg]

I agree with Vicky... and others, like the one list is working....

Abbie Gregg
President
Abbie Gregg, Inc.
1130 East University Drive, Suite 105
Tempe, Arizona 85281
Phone 480 446-8000 x 107
Cell 480-577-5083
FAX 480-446-8001
email agregg at abbiegregg.com<mailto:agregg at abbiegregg.com>
website www.abbiegregg.com<http://www.abbiegregg.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:   All information contained in or attached to this email constitutes confidential information belonging to Abbie Gregg, Inc., its affiliates and subsidiaries and/or its clients.  This email and any attachments are proprietary and/or confidential and are intended for business use of the addressee(s) only.   All other uses or disclosures are strictly prohibited.  If the reader is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that the perusal, copying or dissemination of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, and delete all copies of this message and its attachments immediately.

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Vicky Diadiuk
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 5:11 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Network
Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

HI,
 I respectfully but COMPLETELY disagree.
MIT (Prof Duane Boning to be precise) has been moderating Labnetwork for years & it's working beautifully.
The information one gleans (even if one wasn't explicitly interested before it got asked) is most useful, & participants seem to be pretty relaxed asking specific questions.
If the thread gets too detailed, it switches seamlessly to a conversation between the parties.
I don't think we need to make rather artificial process, equipment & operations distinctions.

If ain't broke ...

 Happy 4th!
Vicky



On Jul 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Bob Henderson wrote:


Mac:

I think that is a wonderful idea. As I am more involved in various equipment and process technologies, it would be a good opportunity to help with more specific issues regarding advancements and new equipment available for a variety of nano specific questions and projects. Bob Henderson

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu<mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mac Hathaway
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:56 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu<mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
Subject: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

Hey All,

As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out of deference to others...

If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the general questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention.

Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...


Mac Hathaway
Harvard CNS
_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu<mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140704/f55ea53d/attachment.html>