[labnetwork] Perspectives on equipment management software

julia.aebersold at louisville.edu julia.aebersold at louisville.edu
Tue Apr 11 17:15:34 EDT 2017


We use FOM at our facility and it is an economical package that serves our cleanroom well.

Cheers!

Julia Aebersold
Manager, Micro/Nano Technology Center
University of Louisville
2210 South Brook Street
Louisville, KY  40292
(502)852-1572

http://louisville.edu/micronano/

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Stieg, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:48 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
Subject: [labnetwork] Perspectives on equipment management software

Hi All,

We are in the process of reviewing our approach to managing reservations, access, billing, etc. for equipment throughout the CNSI at UCLA. To date, we have relied on a system developed in-house that is no longer viable. There is a significant push amongst the shared resources on campus toward iLabs. We have also begun looking into FOM (fomnetworks.com) as an alternative option. I know this may not be the best venue for a dialogue on the strengths/weaknesses of these specific solutions (or any other for that matter), but if any of you are willing to share your perspectives or experiences working with either of these vendors it would be greatly appreciated.

All the best,
Adam


Adam Z. Stieg Ph.D.
Associate Director, California NanoSystems Institute at UCLA
Director, Nano and Pico Characterization Laboratory
Technical Director, Integrated Systems Nanofabrication Cleanroom
(p) 310.206.2902
(e) stieg at cnsi.ucla.edu<mailto:stieg at cnsi.ucla.edu>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20170411/d04708c7/attachment.html>


More information about the labnetwork mailing list