[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Morrison, Richard H., Jr.]

I vote that we keep just one Labnet list. It will just make more work for the person whom moderates the list today. I suggest that we can ask any questions related to fab work including process questions.

Rick


From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mac Hathaway
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 9:56 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
Subject: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

Hey All,

As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out of deference to others...

If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the general questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention.

Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...


Mac Hathaway
Harvard CNS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/c11de81f/attachment.html>