[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Duane Boning]

Hello all,

   A quick note with my preference or suggestion, as your friendly 
behind the scenes moderator. I think everyone on the list should feel 
free and uninhibited to ask those detailed process and equipment 
questions. They seem perfect for the labnetwork list. That would be a 
lot easier than setting up two or three different lists, I think.  If 
later we find out that there's too much traffic, that will be a good 
problem to have (I don't think we're at that kind of high traffic 
situation now) and we could revisit.

   So please do go ahead and post to the list!

Sincerely,
/Duane
-------
Duane S. Boning
Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
MIT, Room 39-415, Cambridge, MA 02139
Phone: 617-253-0931, boning at mtl.mit.edu
Assistant: Grace Lindsay <glindsay at mit.edu> 617-324-4828

On 7/2/2014 9:25 PM, Christopher Raum wrote:
> Hi Mac,
>
> I've been a lurker on labnetwork for a while, and I think an offshoot 
> mailing list to discuss process development would be a great 
> complimentary resource to the labnetwork. The pool of knowledge here 
> is most impressive and if people were willing to participate it would 
> be a valuable resource to all the research and process engineers on 
> the list, not to mention the up and coming graduate fabheads who need 
> tips and tricks to get started. It could be an alternative to 
> MEMS-talk at the MEMS Clearinghouse.
>
> -Chris Raum
> --
> Research Engineer
> Experimental Cosmology Group
> UC Berkeley
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Mac Hathaway 
> <hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu <mailto:hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hey All,
>
>     As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust
>     of Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation
>     and administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow
>     interest), I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't
>     ask certain question, out of deference to others...
>
>     If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list,
>     for instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment",
>     where much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!),
>     such as "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98%
>     purity TMA in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's
>     fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list
>     might bring in other folks for whom the general questions have not
>     been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention.
>
>     Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...
>
>
>     Mac Hathaway
>     Harvard CNS
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     labnetwork mailing list
>     labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
>     https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/1eff7239/attachment.html>