[labnetwork] Fwd: Interlock Boxes

Shivakumar Bhaskaran sbhas at uchicago.edu
Wed Oct 1 14:06:36 EDT 2014


Todd,

Thanks for the interlock system, It was really helpful. I guess each equipment in the cleanroom is equipped with interlock, so you run network cable to unit, Do you ever thought of using the wireless router to do this. Will the Wireless router signal might interfere your sensitive equipment.
Is there any specific network cable you use or regular CAT5 / CAT6 cable is sufficient. Our cleanroom is built without any network port, if I want to do this I have to physically run cable on the ceiling in the chase and drop it next to the equipment. 

--Thanks
--Shiva


Shivakumar Bhaskaran
Searle CleanRoom Manager
University of Chicago
5735 S.Ellis, Room 032
Chicago-60637
Ph:773-795-2297



-----Original Message-----
From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Todd Merport
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 11:36 AM
To: Fab Network
Subject: [labnetwork] Fwd: Interlock Boxes

I hope this is useful.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Todd Merport <merport at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Interlock Boxes
To: Shivakumar Bhaskaran <sbhas at uchicago.edu>


Here are some user account issues that we had in the Berkeley Microlab ( I'm not sure if they are still relevant to the Marvel Nanolab in 2014).

The Marvell Nanolab maintains it's own user database for the following
reasons:  Note, the Nanolab network is administered by the EECS department.

a) The EECS departmental database does not allow account creation of users from other departments without a monthly fee (so members would be billed for two departments in that case).

b) The EECS department doesn't want non paying customers using their network.

c) The campus database does not allow outside industry members to acquire an account without legalese that industry members find unacceptable.

d) Guest users require limited access to layout conversion software ( for mask making) or view only privileges of equipment maintenance, process monitoring, and other database tables. So paying a network access fee is out of the question.

Todd Merport
(formerly of the Microlab/Nanolab)

P.S. A web based interlock system used in some rooms by the Microlab was from WebRelay http://www.controlbyweb.com/webrelay/

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Shivakumar Bhaskaran <sbhas at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am trying to set a interlock system for our cleanroom. In the 
> process I was able to get the phpscheduler up running. Before I design 
> or buy the interlock I need your inputs regarding how to set up.
>
>
>
> Do the user log in to computer that is attached to the unit and 
> validate the credentials and then use the equipment. Inorder to do 
> that user data should be validated by the scheduler system, in that 
> case does user have separate id created or it will be same associated with the campus ID.
>
>
>
> Do the user use separate swipe card in the interlock to access the system.
>
>
>
> Apart from the user access, currently the users access the cleanroom 
> with swipe in card and when they leave they swipe out. But not all the 
> users swipe in or swipe out. Our door system is designed in such a way 
> that it will be opened for atleast for 10-20sec , but with this there 
> is possibility of other users following the previous user without 
> swiping the card. Does any one have system that detect the user based 
> on proximity that automatically gets the user information based on RF 
> ID card without swipe in.
>
>
>
> --Thanks
>
> --Shiva
>
>
>
>
>
> Shivakumar Bhaskaran, Ph.D.
>
> Searle CleanRoom Manager
>
> Uinversity of Chicago
>
> 5735 S.Ellis, Room 032
>
> Chicago-60637
>
> Ph:773-795-2297
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu 
> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu]
> On Behalf Of Michael Rooks
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 9:11 AM
> To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Interlock Boxes
>
>
>
> We use ethernet relay boards from National Control Devices, controlled 
> by Badger (the new version of Coral). NCD also makes wifi connected relays.
> Having two relays on a board makes it easy to keep isolated grounds 
> isolated. Each board requires its own static IPv4 address. The boards 
> can be easily mounted in a 6"x6" electrical box, or in the 
> custom-fitted plastic case from Badgerlms. I suggest you keep these 
> boards behind a firewall, since they run a tiny operating system and 
> web page, but with only minimal security.
>
>
> ---------------------
>
> Michael Rooks
>
> Yale Institute for Nanoscience & Quantum Engineering
>
> nano.yale.edu
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07/11/2014 06:14 AM, Flückiger Philippe wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> EPFL is using Ether IO24 R from http://www.elexol.com/IO_Modules/
>
>
>
> Our software is homemade but we have a call for tenders running in 
> order to “couple our homemade software” with a commercial package.
>
>
>
> We will keep you posted on this important move on which we are 
> investing a lot of effort.
>
>
>
> With my very best regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
> Dr Philippe Flückiger
>
> Director of Operations
>
> http://cmi.epfl.ch/
>
> Phone +41 21 693 6695
>
>
>
> From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu 
> [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu]
> On Behalf Of John Shott
> Sent: jeudi 10 juillet 2014 20:55
> To: Kolin Brown; labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Interlock Boxes
>
>
>
> Kolin:
>
> I believe that most folks are using the Advantech ADAM-6060 or 
> ADAM-6066 6-channel IP-addressable relay modules for interlocking.  
> Others use modules that come from National Control Devices that have 
> 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-relay devices with current ratings from 5 to 30 
> amps.  Most folks are currently using hard-wired ethernet connections, 
> but some wireless options are also available.
>
> I believe that most of these IP-addressable relays are functionally 
> equivalent but would certainly have minor differences in the default 
> port that is used and the exact command sent to turn on, turn off, or 
> check the status of a given relay channel.
>
> I don't have experience with either Cores or iLab software to know 
> what, if any, interlocking hardware has been interfaced with their systems.
>
> Good luck,
>
> John
>
> On 7/10/2014 6:08 AM, Kolin Brown wrote:
>
> Hi!  Here at WVU, we are going to interlock our tools to our 
> reservation software.  Everyone at the UGIM was talking about the 
> “blue boxes” from Advantech.  Can anyone provide me with a model 
> number?  Also, has anyone interfaced these boxes with Cores or iLabs software?
>
>
>
> Kolin Brown
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> labnetwork mailing list
>
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
>
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> labnetwork mailing list
>
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
>
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
>

_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork


More information about the labnetwork mailing list