[labnetwork] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: Bubble formation when e-beam evaporating Gold on PMMA

[Richelson, Tucson]

Hello Philipp,

We've had the same problem. I agree faster is better.

We suspect that stray electrons and ionized metal molecules are interacting with the ebeam resist. We have some limited success in mounting magnets behind the sample to steer them away.

We have had significantly better results by using a smaller crucible. We switched from a 15cc down to 7cc. This reduced our current required to melt from 80mA to 40mA. If you can't use a smaller crucible, try using a graphite spacer between the crucible and the pocket.




Best,

Tucson Richelson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nick Holonyak, Jr. Micro and Nanotechnology Lab (HMNTL)

University of Illinois
Rm 2104

208 North Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801

Ph: 217-244-5138

Web: http://mntl.illinois.edu/

________________________________
From: labnetwork <labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu> on behalf of Hess, Larry A. (GSFC-5530) <larry.hess-1 at nasa.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 12:16
To: Ryan Rivers <rrivers at berkeley.edu>; Philipp Altpeter <philipp.altpeter at lmu.de>
Cc: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [labnetwork] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: Bubble formation when e-beam evaporating Gold on PMMA


Hi Philipp,

I second Ryan’s suggestion about depositing faster!



Best,



Larry



Larry A. Hess, PhD

NASA

Goddard Space Flight Center

8800 Greenbelt Road

Code 553, Detector Systems Branch

Building 11, Room E011

Greenbelt, MD 20771

301-286-0259 (P)

301-286-1672 (F)



From: labnetwork <labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu> On Behalf Of Ryan Rivers
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 3:21 PM
To: Philipp Altpeter <philipp.altpeter at lmu.de>
Cc: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: [labnetwork] Bubble formation when e-beam evaporating Gold on PMMA



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA.  Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.  Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC.



Hi Philipp,



Looks like a heat transfer problem. If you've installed a new tool, it's likely the heat transfer is different than your old one. Here's some basics that can drive it:



Source to substrate distance - you probably can't do anything about this parameter but if this changed from one tool to the other it can be the driving cause of thermal failure. A closer throw distance makes for less wasted material but larger transfer of radiant energy.

Fixturing of the wafer (a wafer with no fixturing behind it heats much faster than one on a thermally conductive surface, even in vacuum) - if your wafer's only being held up by an edge ring you can usually mount a 1/8" copper or other high specific heat disc behind it and help alleviate this kind of problem.

Otherwise it's just pure process development and keeping your total energy emitted from the melt as low as possible. PMMA is fragile stuff and it tends to react strongly to minor heat loads. One of the more counterintuitive realities is that going *faster* may help. Faster depositions finish faster and give the PMMA less time to heat up and react. Bump your dep rate to 4A/s (and make sure to recalibrate your rise and soak before opening the shutter) and see if the problem gets better.



-Ryan



On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:20 AM Philipp Altpeter <philipp.altpeter at lmu.de<mailto:philipp.altpeter at lmu.de>> wrote:

Dear all,

In recent months, we installed a new UHV e-beam evaporator and have since encountered significant issues with our standard lift-off process using 3 nm Chromium followed by 50 nm Gold. Specifically, we are observing the formation of large bubbles beneath the PMMA, which severely damage the PMMA layer (see image below). The rate is decently low, 0.6 A/s at around 40mA emission current, 10 kV. After around 30 nm of thickness, bubbles become clearly visible.

Interestingly, deposition on bare silicon, silicon dioxide, or other (photo)resists appears to proceed without problems.

We have already tried adjusting various parameters — including cooling conditions, beam wobbling, throw distance, and acceleration voltage. We also modified the PMMA baking protocol and tested PMMA dissolved in different solvents — all without success.

If anyone has experienced similar issues or has suggestions for troubleshooting, your input would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Best regards,
Philipp



[cid:image001.png at 01DBFBD4.03F26F60]

--

Philipp Altpeter

Fakultät für Physik der LMU

LS Prof. Efetov

Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1

D-80539 München

T. +49 (0)89 2180-3733

_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu<mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork__;!!DZ3fjg!9v0TqUte8U4KBsRFqoi_k_7cjfTiWyOuhZID6Pz3dHJR1fVkFBTB8GGe6wc7Vd_d-8yCFF-8dAYmWtEyuzaKjGaU5w$>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20250725/d7b45a7f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 383866 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20250725/d7b45a7f/attachment.png>